Sheet06 / 08
Redline · pre-load checkFirst 90 days
Rev A2026-10-22
StatusSample data

First 90 days: how I would run them

Fig 6.1

Six sprints, two gates

S0Wk 1 to 2S1Wk 3 to 4S2Wk 5 to 6S3Wk 7 to 8S4Wk 9 to 10S5Wk 11 to 12Go or no-go: dry runGo or no-go: production
  1. S0, weeks 1 to 2 Discovery and mapping
  2. S1, weeks 3 to 4 Rule catalog on a real export
  3. S2, weeks 5 to 6 Dry-run load and traceGo or no-go before this sprint: dry run
  4. S3, weeks 7 to 8 Dashboards and KPIs
  5. S4, weeks 9 to 10 UAT, training, user guide
  6. S5, weeks 11 to 12 Production readiness and hypercareGo or no-go before this sprint: production
Fig 6.1 Six two-week sprints across 12 weeks. Red diamonds mark the go or no-go decisions. Proposed plan.
Weeks 1 to 2

Sprint 0: Discovery and mapping

Agree on what a correct timing plan looks like before checking any row.

Stories

  • As a PMO lead, I need the legacy export columns mapped to Planisware target fields so the load has a signed specification.
  • As a program planner, I need the gate catalog confirmed against the timing templates so the gate rule checks the real sequence.
  • As a configurator, I need the target schema confirmed in the test environment so no rule checks a field the platform lacks.

Acceptance criteria

  • Mapping table reviewed and signed by the PMO lead
  • Gate catalog and calendar policy written down
  • Target schema confirmed field by field

Demo at sprint review

The mapping table and the confirmed rule catalog, walked through row by row.

Risks

  • Export access takes longer than two weeks
  • Two programs follow two template versions
Weeks 3 to 4

Sprint 1: Rule catalog on a real export

Run the rules on one real program export and get a first ledger.

Stories

  • As a PMO analyst, I need every finding listed with the record and a proposed fix so owners get a work list, not a complaint.
  • As a program manager, I need findings for my program only so I work my own list.

Acceptance criteria

  • Ten rules run on one real export
  • SQL twin for every rule, with the cross-check test green
  • Ledger exported and handed to one program owner

Demo at sprint review

The ledger for one program, sorted BLOCK first.

Risks

  • Rule thresholds need tuning (drift tolerance, rollup tolerance)
Weeks 5 to 6

Sprint 2: Dry-run load and trace

Load the cleaned program into a Planisware test environment and compare.

Stories

  • As a configurator, I need each finding traced from legacy row to loaded object so a fix lands in the right system.
  • As a program owner, I need my fixes confirmed in the dry run so I sign off with evidence.

Acceptance criteria

  • One program loaded in test with zero open BLOCK findings
  • Every REVIEW finding carries a decision note
  • Dry-run differences logged

Demo at sprint review

One record traced from the export, through the rules, into the test environment.

Risks

  • Import validation in the platform rejects rows the check passed
Weeks 7 to 8

Sprint 3: Dashboards and KPIs

Give the PMO one place to see readiness across programs.

Stories

  • As a PMO director, I need programs by verdict and blockers per 100 records so I see readiness at a glance.
  • As an executive sponsor, I need a one-page summary I read before the steering meeting.

Acceptance criteria

  • KPI definitions agreed
  • Executive summary prints on one page
  • Numbers match the ledger exactly

Demo at sprint review

The gate view and the printed one-page summary.

Risks

  • Reporting tool choice still open
Weeks 9 to 10

Sprint 4: UAT, training, user guide

Prove the rules with users and teach the workflow.

Stories

  • As a UAT tester, I need scenarios generated from the rules so the test plan matches the logic.
  • As a planner, I need a short guide and a workbook so I fix my own findings.

Acceptance criteria

  • Every UAT scenario run and marked
  • Two training sessions held
  • User guide published

Demo at sprint review

A tester running three scenarios live, plus the user guide.

Risks

  • Tester availability during program gate reviews
Weeks 11 to 12

Sprint 5: Production readiness and hypercare

Release the load and watch the parallel run.

Stories

  • As the PMO lead, I need a sign-off sheet so the go decision has a record.
  • As a program manager, I need a weekly drift report while the legacy tool stays live so slips surface before steering meetings.

Acceptance criteria

  • Sign-off sheet complete for the wave
  • Drift report runs weekly
  • Hypercare issue log open and owned

Demo at sprint review

The signed sheet, the first production load, and the first drift report.

Risks

  • Legacy edits continue after the freeze date
Practice

Ceremonies

Daily stand-up
15 minutes. Yesterday, today, blockers, with the ledger count on screen.
Sprint planning
Stories pulled from the backlog with acceptance criteria written before work starts.
Design review
Mapping and rule changes reviewed with the PMO before code.
Sprint review
Live demo on real data. No slides.
Retrospective
One process change per sprint, tracked to the next retro.

Sheet index

  1. 01CoverWho built Redline, what the check does, and where to start.
  2. 02The checkThe working tool: programs, rules, trace, ledger, gate, SQL bench, drift.2 of 3 blockedBLOCK
  3. 03Case studyContext, observations, solution, measurement plan, and limits.
  4. 04Readiness auditPrioritized findings with evidence, printable.
  5. 05WorkbookSix guided exercises on the sample data.
  6. 06First 90 daysSix two-week sprints with stories and acceptance criteria.
  7. 07FitRequirement to evidence map, with the gaps stated plainly.
  8. 08SystemTokens, components, motion spec, and how to adapt the set.
  9. ATTAttachmentsResume, cover letter, sample data, and session exports.

Arrow keys move. Enter opens. Esc closes.